Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 3-14, February 2010

Restraints and the code of ethics: An uneasy fit

  • Wanda K. Mohr

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding Author: Wanda K. Mohr, PhD, APRN, FAAN, Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing, UMDNJ School of Nursing, Stratford, NJ 07107-3001.

Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing, UMDNJ School of Nursing, Stratford, NJ

published online 07 August 2009.

This article examines the use of physical restraints through the four broad principles of ethics common to all helping professions. It asks whether the continued use of physical restraints is consistent with ethical practice through the lens of those principles. It also examines where the necessity to use restraints in the absence of empirically supported alternatives leaves professionals in terms of conflicts between ethical principles and makes recommendations for changes in education and clinical practice. It concludes that an analysis through a bioethics lens demonstrates that the use of restraints as a tool in psychiatric settings is a complex and multifaceted problem. Principles of ethics may often be in conflict with each other in instances where patients must be physically restrained.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0883-9417(09)00043-0

doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2009.03.003

Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 3-14, February 2010