Developing Distress Protocols for Research on Sensitive Topics

Published:January 16, 2009DOI:
      Two protocols that were developed to address risks related to emotional distress in an ongoing, qualitative, community-based study of adolescent dating violence are presented. The first protocol is for use in telephone screening to identify individuals at high risk of adverse emotional reactions. The second protocol guides interviewer's responses to emotional distress expressed by participants during in-depth research interviews. The study is briefly described, and the process used to develop the protocols is discussed. The process of developing the protocols caused the authors to reconsider some previously held assumptions about human subject protections in research on sensitive topics.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Barnbaum D.R.
        • Byron M.
        Research ethics: Text and readings.
        Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ2001
        • Becker-Blease K.A.
        • Freyd J.J.
        Research participants telling the truth about their lives: The ethics of asking and not asking about abuse.
        American Psychologist. 2006; 61: 218-226
        • Boothroyd R.A.
        The impact of research participation on adults with severe mental illness.
        Mental Health Services Research. 2000; 2: 213-221
        • Boothroyd R.A.
        • Best K.A.
        Emotional reactions to research participation and the relationship to understanding informed consent disclosure.
        Social Work Research. 2003; 27: 242-251
        • Dean K.L.
        • Stein B.D.
        • Jaycox L.H.
        • Kataoka S.H.
        • Wong M.
        Acceptability of asking parents about their children's traumatic symptoms.
        Psychiatric Services. 2004; 55: 866
        • Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
        The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: The Belmont Report.
        (Retrieved on July 21, 2008, from)
        • Draucker C.B.
        The emotional impact of sexual violence research on participants.
        Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 1999; 13: 161-169
        • Griffin M.G.
        • Resick P.A.
        • Waldrop A.E.
        • Mechanic M.B.
        Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm?.
        Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2003; 16: 221-227
        • Hawton K.
        • Houston K.
        • Malmberg A.
        • Simkin S.
        Psychological autopsy interviews in suicide research: The reactions of informants.
        Archives of Suicide Research. 2003; 7: 73-82
        • Jorm A.F.
        • Kelly C.M.
        • Morgan A.J.
        Participant distress in psychiatric research: A systematic review.
        Psychological Medicine. 2007; 37: 917-926
        • Lee R.M.
        • Renzetti C.M.
        The problems of researching sensitive topics: An overview and introduction.
        in: Renzetti C.M. Lee R.M. Researching sensitive topics. Sage, Newbury Park, CA1993: 3-13
        • Newman E.
        • Kaloupek D.G.
        The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies.
        Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2004; 17: 383-394
        • Newman E.
        • Walker E.A.
        • Gefland A.
        Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research.
        General Hospital Psychiatry. 1999; 21: 187-196
        • Stanton A.L.
        • New M.J.
        Ethical responsibilities to depressed research participants.
        Professional Psychology, Research, and Practice. 1988; 19: 279-285