Advertisement

The window to the world for individuals with mental disorders: A qualitative study about social media

  • Gülhan Küçük Öztürk
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Semra and Vefa Kucuk Faculty of Health Sciences, Nevşehir, Turkey.
    Affiliations
    Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Semra and Vefa Küçük Faculty of Health Sciences, Nevşehir, Turkey
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kamuran Özdil
    Affiliations
    Aged Care Program, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Health Services Vocational School, Nevşehir, Turkey
    Search for articles by this author
Published:March 11, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2022.03.001

      Abstract

      This study aimed to determine the views of individuals with mental disorders on the experience of social media. This was a qualitative study conducted using the content analysis method. Using purposive sampling, 12 individuals with mental disorders were selected and interviewed. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using the content analysis method. Four main themes and 10 subthemes were identified. The themes included the window opening to the world (source of information, facilitating life), from invisibility to visibility (feeling good, liberation and socialization), negative experiences (feeling lost, envy, and privacy), and the rejection of society (escape and stigmatization). Individuals with mental disorders stated that social media had both positive as well as negative effects on their lives. The results of the study highlight the various aspects of social media use and its effects on individuals with mental disorders. These results can be used in planning and implementing mental health services for individuals with mental disorders.

      Accessible summary

      What is known about the subject?
      • In the current age, social media is a part of daily life.
      • Social media has many positive and negative effects on the lives of individuals with mental disorders.
      What does the paper add to existing knowledge?
      • This study provides information to mental health professionals about how individuals with mental disorders evaluate social media, what it means to them, and the effects of social media.
      • The study provides ideas regarding the experience of social media as a tool to offer mental health services.
      What are the implications for the practice?
      • The results of this study show that the positive aspects of social media can be used to maintain and improve the mental health of individuals with mental disorders.
      • Mental health professionals should tackle the negative effects caused by social media use, such as stigmatization, jealousy, and waste of time.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alvarez-Jimenez M.
        • Bendall S.
        • Lederman R.
        • Wadley G.
        • Chinnery G.
        • Vargas S.
        • Gleeson J.F.
        On the Horizon: moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis.
        Schizophrenia Research. 2013; 143: 143-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2012.10.009
        • Berry N.
        • Emsley R.
        • Lobban F.
        • Bucci S.
        Social media and its relationship with mood, self-esteem and paranoia in psychosis.
        Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2018; 138: 558-570https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12953
        • Biggerstaff D.
        • Thompson A.R.
        Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research.
        Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2008; 5: 214-224
        • Birnbaum M.L.
        • Rizvi A.F.
        • Correll C.U.
        • Kane J.M.
        Role of social media and the Internet in pathways to care for adolescents and young adults with psychotic disorders and non-psychotic mood disorders.
        in: Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 2015https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12237 (Advance online publication)
        • Brunette M.
        • Achtyes E.
        • Pratt S.
        • Stilwell K.
        • Opperman M.
        • Guarino S.
        • Kay-Lambkin F.
        Use of smartphones, computers and social media among people with SMI: opportunity for intervention.
        Community Mental Health Journal. 2019; : 1-6
        • Brusilovskiy E.
        • Townley G.
        • Snethen G.
        • Salzer M.S.
        Social media use, community participation and psychological well-being among individuals with serious mental illnesses.
        Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 65: 232-240https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.036
        • Bucci S.
        • Schwannauer M.
        • Berry N.
        The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care.
        Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2019; 92: 277-297https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12222
        • Budenz A.
        • Klassen A.
        • Purtle J.
        • Yom Tov E.
        • Yudell M.
        • Massey P.
        Mental illness and bipolar disorder on Twitter: implications for stigma and social support.
        Journal of Mental Health. 2020; 29: 191-199https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1677878
        • Budenz A.
        • Purtle J.
        • Klassen A.
        • Yom-Tov E.
        • Yudell M.
        • Massey P.
        The case of a mass shooting and violence-related mental illness stigma on Twitter.
        Stigma and Health. 2019; 4: 411-420https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000155
        • Buzlu S.
        • Şahin G.
        Community mental health nursing approach to severe chronic mental health disorders.
        (editör)in: Ünsal Barlas G. Turkiye Klinikleri Psychiatric Nursing. 2018: 7-62
        • Creswell J.W.
        Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study.
        2013
        • Do M.
        • McCleary J.
        • Nguyen D.
        • Winfrey K.
        Mental illness public stigma and generational differences among Vietnamese Americans.
        Community Mental Health Journal. 2020; 56: 839-853https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00545-y
        • Dwyer S.C.
        • Buckle J.L.
        The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research.
        International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2009; 8: 54-63https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105
        • Eschler J.
        • Burgess E.R.
        • Reddy M.
        • Mohr D.C.
        Emergent self-regulation practices in technology and social media use of individuals living with depression.
        in: Proceedings of the 2020 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 2020: 1-13https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376773
        • Gowen K.
        • Deschaine M.
        • Gruttadara D.
        • Markey D.
        Young adults with mental health conditions and social networking websites: Seeking tools to build community.
        Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2012; 35: 245https://doi.org/10.2975/35.3.2012.245.2502002
        • Grieve R.
        • Indian M.
        • Witteveen K.
        • Tolan G.A.
        • Marrington J.
        Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online?.
        Computers in Human Behavior. 2013; 29: 604-609https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017
        • Holt R.
        • Sandberg J.
        Fenomenoloji ve örgüt teorisi.
        in: Tsoukas H. Chia içinde R. Örgüt Sosyolojisi Araştırmaları-Felsefe ve Örgüt Teorisi. Cilt 32. Nobel, Ankara2013: 215-251 (İ. Anıl, Çev.)
        • Joseph J.J.
        Facebook, social comparison, and subjective well-being: an examination of the interaction between active and passive facebook use on subjective well-being.
        in: The psychology and dynamics behind social media interactions. 268-288. 2020https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9412-3.ch011
        • Kolliakou A.
        • Bakolis I.
        • Chandran D.
        • Derczynski L.
        • Werbeloff N.
        • Osborn D.P.J.
        • Stewart R.
        Mental health-related conversations on social media and crisis episodes: a time-series regression analysis.
        Scientific Reports. 2020; 10https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57835-9
        • Kudva K.G.
        • El Hayek S.
        • Gupta A.K.
        • Kurokawa S.
        • Bangshan L.
        • Armas-Villavicencio M.V.C.
        • Sartorius N.
        Stigma in mental illness: Perspective from eight Asian nations.
        Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. 2020; e12380https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12380
        • Kümbetoğlu B.
        Sosyoloji ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve araştırma.
        Bağlam Yayıncılık, İstanbul2005
        • Kyngäs H.
        • Mikkonen K.
        • Kääriäinen M.
        • (Eds.).
        The application of content analysis in nursing science research.
        Springer Nature, 2019: 3-11
        • leickly e.
        Urbanicity as a moderator of the relationship between stigma and well-being outcomes for individuals with serious mental illnesses.
        2019
        • Li A.
        • Jiao D.
        • Liu X.
        • Zhu T.
        A comparison of the psycholinguistic styles of schizophrenia-related stigma and depression-related stigma on social media: Content analysis.
        Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; 22e16470
        • McKenna K.Y.
        • Green A.S.
        • Gleason M.E.
        Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?.
        Journal of Social Issues. 2002; 58: 9-31https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246
        • Miller B.J.
        • Stewart A.
        • Schrimsher J.
        • Peeples D.
        • Buckley P.F.
        How connected are people with schizophrenia? Cell phone, computer, email, and social media use.
        Psychiatry Research. 2015; 225: 458-463https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.067
        • Naslund J.A.
        • Aschbrenner K.A.
        Risks to privacy with use of social media: understanding the views of social media users with serious mental illness.
        Psychiatric Services. 2019; 70: 561-568https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800520
        • Naslund J.A.
        • Aschbrenner K.A.
        • Bartels S.J.
        How people living with serious mental illness use smartphones, mobile apps, and social media.
        Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2016; 39: 364-367https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000207
        • Naslund J.A.
        • Aschbrenner K.A.
        • Marsch L.A.
        • Bartels S.J.
        The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media.
        Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 2016; 25: 113-122https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067
        • Naslund J.A.
        • Aschbrenner K.A.
        • McHugo G.J.
        • Unützer J.
        • Marsch L.A.
        • Bartels S.J.
        Exploring opportunities to support mental health care using social media: A survey of social media users with mental illness.
        Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 2019; 13: 405-413https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12496
        • O’Reilly M.
        • Dogra N.
        • Whiteman N.
        • Hughes J.
        • Eruyar S.
        • Reilly P.
        Is social media bad for mental health and wellbeing? Exploring the perspectives of adolescents.
        Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2018; 23: 601-613https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104518775154
        • Patton M.Q.
        Bütün M. Demir S.B. Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. 2. Pegem Akademi, Baskı, Ankara2014 (Çeviri Ed:)
        • Robinson A.
        • Bonnette A.
        • Howard K.
        • Ceballos N.
        • Dailey S.
        • Lu Y.
        • Grimes T.
        Social comparisons, social media addiction, and social interaction: An examination of specific social media behaviors related to major depressive disorder in a millennial population.
        Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research. 2019; 24e12158https://doi.org/10.1111/jabr.12158
        • Terry R.
        • Townley G.
        • Brusilovskiy E.
        • Salzer M.S.
        The influence of sense of community on the relationship between community participation and mental health for individuals with serious mental illnesses.
        Journal of Community Psychology. 2019; 47: 163-175https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22115
        • Verduyn P.
        • Ybarra O.
        • Résibois M.
        • Jonides J.
        • Kross E.
        Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review.
        Social Issues and Policy Review. 2017; 11: 274-302https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033
        • Wilson A.
        A guide to phenomenological research.
        Nursing Standard. 2015; 29: 38
        • World Health Organization (WHO)
        Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP).
        (web site:)
        • World Health Organization (WHO)
        Mental health: Fact sheet.
        (web site:)
        • World Health Organization (WHO)
        Mental disorders.